Sindrome aórtico agudo

 Abstract

Acute aortic syndrome embraces a group of heterogenous pathological entities involving the aortic wall with a common clinical profile. The current epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment strategy are discussed in this review. Besides, the importance of multidisciplinary aortic teams, aortic centers and the implementation of an aortic code are emphasized.

Keywords: Acute aortic syndrome; Aortic code; Aortic dissection; Código aorta; Disección aórtica; Hematoma intramural aórtico; Intramural aortic hematoma; Penetrating aortic ulcer; Síndrome aórtico agudo; Úlcera penetrante aórtica.*1

Abstract

Background: Acute aortic syndromes comprise a spectrum of diseases including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers. Early diagnosis, rapid intervention, and multidisciplinary team care are vital to efficiently manage time-sensitive aortic emergencies, mobilize appropriate resources, and optimize clinical outcomes.

Objective: This comprehensive review outlines the multidisciplinary team approach from initial presentation to definitive interventional treatment and post-operative care.

Discussion: Acute aortic syndromes can be life-threatening and require prompt diagnosis and aggressive initiation of blood pressure and pain control to prevent subsequent complications. Early time to diagnosis and intervention are associated with improved outcomes.

Conclusions: A multidisciplinary team can help promptly diagnose and manage aortic syndromes.

Keywords: Aortic dissection; Aortic syndromes; Cardiac surgery; Vascular surgery.*2

Abstract

Acute aortic syndromes are disorders of the thoracic and abdominal aorta that are usually symptomatic and require urgent evaluation and treatment. They include acute aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Knowledge of the natural history of these conditions, prompt diagnosis, and surgical intervention, when indicated, are the keys to successful outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures *3

Abstract

Objective: For intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, long-term behavior and treatment are controversial. This study evaluates the long-term behavior of intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, including radiologic follow-up and survival analysis.

Methods: Between 1995 and 2014, 108 patients (mean age, 70.8 ± 10 years; 56% female) presented with intramural hematoma or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer to Yale-New Haven Hospital (New Haven, Conn). We reviewed the medical records, radiology, and online mortality databases.

Results: Ten of 55 patients (18%) with intramural hematoma and 17 of 53 patients (32%) with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer had rupture state symptoms on admission, both greater than type A (8%) or type B dissection (4%) (P < .001). No branch vascular occlusion occurred. For patients with intramural hematoma with follow-up imaging, 8 of 14 (57%) worsened (mean follow-up, 9.4 months) and 6 (43%) underwent late surgery. For patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer with follow-up imaging, 6 of 20 (30%) worsened and underwent late surgery, and 11 (55%) showed no change (mean follow-up, 34.3 months). Overall survivals were 77%, 70%, 58%, and 33% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. No operative deaths occurred for patients with nonrupture state. Patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer with initial surgical treatment had better long-term survival than patients treated medically (P = .037). In the intramural hematoma group, no such difference was observed (P = .10).

Conclusions: At presentation, the incidence of early rupture of intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer was higher than for typical dissection. For branch vessels, intramural hematoma never occludes branch arteries. On imaging follow-up, patients with intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer rarely improved, with late surgery commonly needed. Better survival was observed for the initial surgical management of patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer compared with initial medical management.

Keywords: intramural hematoma; long-term follow-up; penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer.

Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer *4

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to analyze aortic-related outcomes after diagnosis of aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH), and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) from a population-based approach.

Methods: Retrospective review of an incident cohort of AD, IMH, and PAU patients in Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1995 to 2015. Primary end point was aortic death. Secondary end points were subsequent aortic events (aortic intervention, new dissection, or rupture not present at presentation) and first-time diagnosis of an aortic aneurysm. Outcomes were compared with randomly selected population referents matched for age and sex in a 3:1 ratio using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for comorbidities.

Results: Among 133 patients (77 AD, 21 IMH, and 35 PAU), 57% were males, and mean age was 71.8 years (standard deviation, 14). Median follow-up was 10 years. Of 73 deaths among AD/IMH/PAU patients, 23 (32%) were aortic-related. Estimated freedom from aortic death was 84%, 80%, and 77% at 5, 10, and 15 years. There were no aortic deaths among population referents (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for aortic death in AD/IMH/PAU, 184.7; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.3-3,299.2; P < 0.001). Fifty (38%) AD/IMH/PAU patients had a subsequent aortic event (aortic intervention, new dissection, or rupture), whereas there were 8 (2%) aortic events among population referents (all elective aneurysm repairs; adjusted HR for any aortic event and aortic intervention in AD/IMH/PAU patients, 33.3; 95% CI, 15.3-72.0; P < 0.001 and 31.5; 95% CI, 14.5-68.4; P < 0.001, respectively). After excluding aortic events/interventions ≤14 days of diagnosis, AD/IMH/PAU patients remained at increased risk of any aortic event (adjusted HR, 10.8; 95% CI, 3.9-29.8; P < 0.001) and aortic intervention (adjusted HR, 9.6; 95% CI, 3.4-26.8; P < 0.001). Among those subjects with available follow-up imaging, the risk of first-time diagnosis of aortic aneurysm was significantly increased for AD/IMH/PAU patients when compared with population referents (adjusted HR, 10.9; 95% CI, 5.4-21.7; P < 0.001 and 8.3; 95% CI, 4.1-16.7; P < 0.001 for thoracic and abdominal aneurysms, respectively) and remained increased when excluding aneurysms that formed within 14 days of AD/IMH/PAU (adjusted HR, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.8-21.1; P = 0.004 and 2.8; 95% CI, 1.0-7.6; P = 0.040 for thoracic and abdominal aneurysms, respectively).

Conclusions: AD/IMH/PAU patients have a substantial risk of aortic death, any aortic event, aortic intervention, and first-time diagnosis of aortic aneurysm that persists even when the acute phase (≤14 days after diagnosis) is uncomplicated. Advances in postdiagnosis treatment are necessary to improve the prognosis in these patients.

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

*1Acute aortic syndrome

[Article in English, Spanish]

Isidre Vilacosta et al. Med Clin (Barc). 2024.

*2Management of acute aortic syndromes from initial presentation to definitive treatment

Christopher K Mehta et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan.

*3Acute Aortic Syndromes: Diagnosis and Treatment

Michael C Murphy et al. Mo Med. 2017 Nov-Dec.

*4Long-term behavior of aortic intramural hematomas and penetrating ulcers

Alan S Chou et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb.

*5 Population-Based Assessment of Aortic-Related Outcomes in Aortic Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

Salome Weiss et al. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov.